Review economics
psf/black
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥2%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#5272 Keep the required trailing comma of a one-element subscript under --skip-magic-trailing-comma
2 reviews · 5.7d to merge
#5294 docs: fix typos in docstrings, and remove some unused code
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#5277 remove unused RARROW constant
1 reviews · 4.0d to merge
#5278 remove duplicate syms.for_stmt entry
1 reviews · 4.0d to merge
#5283 docs: fix typo in StringParser comment
1 reviews · 4.0d to merge
How this was measured
2% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 4 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 1880 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read psf/black weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on psf/black — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository