Review economics
polakowo/vectorbt
Read from the 59 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.2× the time to merge of the rest.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
56
Other PRs
59
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#860 Initialize from_order_func record buffers before exposing them to callbacks
0 reviews · 5.0d to merge
#859 Fix custom benchmark plotting for selected portfolio columns
0 reviews · 21h to merge
#864 fix(generic): use Welford's algorithm for numerically stable rolling std
1 round · 1 reviews · 2.0d to merge
#857 Fix zero-N mapped masks and speed up top/bottom N selection
0 reviews · 24h to merge
#854 Fix Data.get for unnamed multi-symbol series
1 reviews · 15h to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Cursor agent, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read polakowo/vectorbt weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on polakowo/vectorbt — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository