Review economics
pjreddie/darknet
Read from the 10 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
10
Other PRs
10
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#2526 Closes #2525
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#462 coordinate calculation fixed in place_image(). dtype int -> float
0 reviews · 47.6d to merge
#589 Update yolov2-tiny.cfg
0 reviews · 3h to merge
#464 Updated stb_image.
1 reviews · 44.5d to merge
#534 Better, faster, stronger numpy interface
0 reviews · 9.0d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read pjreddie/darknet weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on pjreddie/darknet — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository