Review economics
phiresky/ripgrep-all
Read from the 57 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
56
Other PRs
57
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#334 chore(workflow): Update to windows-2025 runner
0 reviews · 39.8d to merge
#291 Add release build targets
0 reviews · 153.5d to merge
#306 Simplify Nix flake and update to Rust 1.90.0
0 reviews · 23.1d to merge
#308 Fix CVE-2025-62518 by upgrading astral-tokio-tar
0 reviews · 13.5d to merge
#285 Include `rga-fzf-open` binary in GitHub releases
0 reviews · 2.9d to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read phiresky/ripgrep-all weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on phiresky/ripgrep-all — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository