Review economics
aaif-goose/goose
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.8× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥3%
Attributed
a floor
6
Attributed PRs
94
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#10665 fix(desktop): avoid O(n²) cloning during session load
3 reviews · 11.3d to merge
#10816 feat(otel): enrich root span with gen_ai attributes and improve output format
3 reviews · 32h to merge
#10487 perf: make CLI streaming render incremental instead of O(n^2)
7 reviews · 15.3d to merge
#10713 fix(kimi-code): update known models metadata with current platform lineup
2 reviews · 2.6d to merge
#10696 fix(providers): refresh Moonshot model list with current Kimi lineup
2 reviews · 3.6d to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#10793 fix: restore final_output_tool when agent is recreated after LRU eviction
2 reviews · 6.0d to merge
#10795 feat(ui): bring back make sidebar resizable with drag handle and persisted width
2 reviews · 6.0d to merge
#10759 docs: document auto-injected GOOSE_SHELL flags
3 reviews · 7.2d to merge
#10831 feat: surface output-token-limit info
24 reviews · 4.5d to merge
#10327 feat: add interactive menu for single select elicitations
12 reviews · 26.8d to merge
How this was measured
3% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 7 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 5737 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read aaif-goose/goose weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on aaif-goose/goose — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository