Review economics
VectifyAI/PageIndex
Read from the 79 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥7%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
79
Other PRs
79
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#387 Exclude common words from roman numeral conversion
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#386 Add a Flash summary flag
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#385 Update README
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#384 Use embedded PDF bookmarks in Flash trees
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#381 Fail fast on rejected keys and unknown models
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
7% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code, GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read VectifyAI/PageIndex weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on VectifyAI/PageIndex — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository