Review economics
optiscaler/OptiScaler
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#1036 Fix xell context and Don't call it repeatedly o_xellSetSleepMode
0 reviews · 29h to merge
#875 Fix NGX Lifetime Management and Manual FSR FOV Conversion
12 reviews · 21.9d to merge
#982 adjust wording of menu upscaler instructions
1 reviews · 15h to merge
#977 Fixing Ffx path typos in Config.cpp
0 reviews · 4h to merge
#972 Native vulkan fixes
0 reviews · 9h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 3 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 129 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read optiscaler/OptiScaler weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on optiscaler/OptiScaler — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository