Review economics
octokatherine/readme.so
Read from the 92 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
91
Other PRs
92
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#335 Accessibility, modal refactor, and quality-of-life improvements
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#305 fix: replace color code placeholder path
1 reviews · 46.5d to merge
#237 Implement Uzbek language support
0 reviews · 113.8d to merge
#278 Feature Request: Search box above section list #277
2 reviews · 110.3d to merge
#281 fix(#247): fix color display of preview column under dark mode
1 reviews · 8.2d to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read octokatherine/readme.so weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on octokatherine/readme.so — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository