Review economics
nilaoda/N_m3u8DL-RE
Read from the 86 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.1× the time to merge of the rest.
≥9%
Attributed
a floor
11
Attributed PRs
75
Other PRs
86
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#918 Add period= selector key for multi-Period DASH streams
0 reviews · 21h to merge
#917 Fix DASH segment reference duplication causing double download (#684)
0 reviews · 22h to merge
#916 Show a clear message when ffmpeg merge fails with "Too many open files" (#338, #89)
0 reviews · 4h to merge
#912 Apply --ad-keyword filtering to live streams (and EXT-X-MAP init)
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#914 Fix log file name race between concurrent instances
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
9% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read nilaoda/N_m3u8DL-RE weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on nilaoda/N_m3u8DL-RE — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository