Review economics
nicklockwood/SwiftFormat
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.6× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥67%
Attributed
a floor
56
Attributed PRs
44
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#2638 Update ifExpressions to convert ternaries nested in if expression branches
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#2636 Change `ifExpressions` to disabled by default, default `--single-line-ternary` to `convert`
0 reviews · 7h to merge
#2634 Add `ifExpressions` rule to convert ternaries to if expressions
5 reviews · 16h to merge
#2635 Update redundantBackticks to preserve backticks on Swift Testing @Test functions
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#2631 Add collection types to genericExtensions rule
3 reviews · 4h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#2639 Preserve properties used in compiler-generated Equatable and Hashable conformances
5 reviews · 12h to merge
#2521 Fix race condition when parsing config files
0 reviews · 3h to merge
#2637 Fix issue where swiftTestingTestCaseNames rule could accidentally not add backticks when required
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#2621 fix: don't remove redundant returns from switch/if inside a flatMap closure
2 reviews · 28h to merge
#2614 Update project credits and add methodology for future updates
0 reviews · 24h to merge
How this was measured
67% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 1 PR came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 805 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent, Claude Code, OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read nicklockwood/SwiftFormat weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on nicklockwood/SwiftFormat — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository