Review economics
mrdoob/three.js
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests · · read 2 times
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 3.3× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥8%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
97
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#34167 FBXLoader: Support multiple clips in single timeline.
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#34164 MeshPhysicalNodeMaterial: Fix specular nodes.
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#34161 Src: Clean up
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#34160 chore(deps): update dependency eslint-plugin-jsdoc to v63.3.3
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#34158 chore(deps): update github/codeql-action digest to f205ea1
0 reviews · 1h to merge
How this was measured
8% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 15921 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code, Cursor agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read mrdoob/three.js weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on mrdoob/three.js — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository