Review economics
mxrch/GHunt
Read from the 49 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
49
Other PRs
49
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#592 fix: handle missing container key in cover photo metadata and undefined photos/reviews variables
0 reviews · 15h to merge
#521 Use distinct exit codes for intentional exits
0 reviews · 334.2d to merge
#572 bump pillow for python 3.14 support
0 reviews · 20.4d to merge
#463 Update email.py
5 reviews · 576.9d to merge
#555 Fix syntax in `ghunt login`
0 reviews · 4.8d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read mxrch/GHunt weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on mxrch/GHunt — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository