Review economics
dbeaver/dbeaver
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#41664 dbeaver/pro#10086 collect more logs
9 reviews · 47h to merge
#41633 dbeaver/pro#8482 Cassandra and Redis: Add SSL configuration fields si…
1 reviews · 7.0d to merge
#41554 dbeaver/dbeaver#38386 Preserve NCHAR length in Netezza DDL
2 reviews · 18.8d to merge
#40911 #40910 Add GreptimeDB driver support
9 reviews · 100.1d to merge
#41661 dbeaver/pro#10072 Fix bottom buttons in data transfer
3 reviews · 4.0d to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 7278 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Cursor agent, GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read dbeaver/dbeaver weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on dbeaver/dbeaver — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository