Review economics
mixxxdj/mixxx
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥0%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#16804 Track Info Dialog: Add tooltip to cover art image
13 reviews · 5.3d to merge
#16724 Always quantize loop endpoints to closest beat
1 reviews · 15.0d to merge
#16837 Merge changes from `2.5` into `2.6`
1 reviews · 7h to merge
#16836 QML: enable Quick.Effects on Windows and Mac
1 reviews · 9h to merge
#16828 Sync branch 2.5 to 2.6
1 reviews · 13h to merge
How this was measured
0% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 6573 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read mixxxdj/mixxx weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on mixxxdj/mixxx — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository