Review economics
saadeghi/daisyui
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.5× the commits after first review of the rest.
≥10%
Attributed
a floor
23
Attributed PRs
77
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#4643 fix(table): pin thead/tfoot as a group so multi-row headers stack
0 reviews · 7.2d to merge
#4642 fix(join): use z-index instead of isolation so tooltips aren't trapped
0 reviews · 6.9d to merge
#4636 fix(select,input,textarea,rating): restore -xs/-sm size modifiers in the packed CSS
1 reviews · 4.0d to merge
#4635 fix(calendar): replace invalid ::part(day):hover:not(selected, today) selector
1 round · 3 reviews · 3.8d to merge
#4626 fix(footer): make footer-center a standalone class so max-lg:footer-center works
0 reviews · 8.8d to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#4652 fix: allow user override of content in calendar and menu
0 reviews · 2.1d to merge
#4656 refactor(input,select): remove redundant isolation on focus
1 reviews · 38h to merge
#4657 refactor(otp): remove redundant isolation on focus-within
1 reviews · 38h to merge
#4655 fix: select open arrow should only be shown when open
0 reviews · 6h to merge
#4654 fix: force LTR for special case input types
1 round · 1 reviews · 3h to merge
How this was measured
10% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 1 PR came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 599 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read saadeghi/daisyui weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on saadeghi/daisyui — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository