Review economics
maboloshi/github-chinese
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥0%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
99
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#768 feat: AI 代码审查工作流（DeepSeek，类 Copilot，自付额度）
0 reviews · 45h to merge
#769 ci: 升级构建流程和依赖
0 reviews · 26h to merge
#766 fix: 重构 vscode-extension 用 VS Code browser API + CDP 直接注入，替代 IBE 修复集成浏览器无法翻译
0 reviews · 3.4d to merge
#770 添加词条：杂项
0 reviews · 2h to merge
#725 test: fix issue 702 regression expectations
0 reviews · 29.4d to merge
How this was measured
0% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 2 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 276 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read maboloshi/github-chinese weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on maboloshi/github-chinese — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository