Review economics
lokesh/color-thief
Read from the 52 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.0× the time to merge of the rest.
≥4%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
49
Other PRs
52
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#286 Guard against referenced-but-unpublished files in the tarball
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#285 fix: remove dangling WASM import that warned in bundlers
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#282 Add wide-gamut (Display P3) support
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#281 refactor: improve performance and accuracy for images with few colors
0 reviews · 47.0d to merge
#275 chore: improved tests
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
4% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read lokesh/color-thief weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on lokesh/color-thief — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository