Review economics
lingochamp/FileDownloader
Read from the 36 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
36
Other PRs
36
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#1236 fix: fix the issue of "Requested Range Not Satisfiable" which will occur when resuming the previous download task after upgrading from version 1.6.9 to 1.7.X #1168
1 reviews · 3h to merge
#1076 refactor: support character set and language Encoding for Content-Dis…
0 reviews · 15h to merge
#1296 fix: close automation redirects of HttpUrlConnection
2 reviews · 7.0d to merge
#1271 demo: correct single task sample url
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#1270 fix: may throw cast exception in FileDownloadThreadPool
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read lingochamp/FileDownloader weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on lingochamp/FileDownloader — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository