Review economics
libnoname/noname
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#4170 feat: 新武将+素材补充+武将调整
2 rounds · 4 reviews · 6.3d to merge
#4210 fix: 修复已编译武将包下未进行async化的卡牌在编译后出现问题
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#4196 fix(electron): 将应用菜单移入主进程原生注册，修复对话框按钮误触发菜单项
1 reviews · 47h to merge
#4184 fix: 根据11.5版本公告完善replace文件
1 round · 2 reviews · 3.2d to merge
#4202 fix: bugfix
1 reviews · 20h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 2621 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read libnoname/noname weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on libnoname/noname — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository