Review economics
leaningtech/webvm
Read from the 49 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.0× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥3%
Attributed
a floor
4
Attributed PRs
45
Other PRs
49
Read
Attributed — the latest 4
The rest — the latest 5
#221 reverted dockerfiles to debian buster for stability
0 reviews · 8.0d to merge
#219 Validate Tailscale login URL scheme
1 reviews · 4h to merge
#218 Readme dev image updates
1 reviews · 7.9d to merge
#216 Readme renewal
1 round · 5 reviews · 7.0d to merge
#212 elaborated on the exit node setup documentation for added clarity
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
3% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Google Jules.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read leaningtech/webvm weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on leaningtech/webvm — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository