Review economics
laramies/theHarvester
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#2473 Bound OTX rate-limit retries
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#2472 Harden public passive provider contracts
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#2471 Preserve shared HTTP response metadata
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#2470 fix: retain CNAME screenshot candidates
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#2469 fix: preserve generic people in completed results
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 39 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 1517 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read laramies/theHarvester weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on laramies/theHarvester — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository