Review economics
iina/iina
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥0%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#6100 Unlocking window aspect ratio
0 reviews · 41h to merge
#6218 Add Auto Skip plugin to community plugins
2 reviews · 34h to merge
#6207 add Detached Playlist to the plugin list
1 reviews · 9h to merge
#6200 build: support macOS 27 in Availability.xcconfig
1 reviews · 8h to merge
#6178 Fix Live Text UI issues: OSC autohide glitch on shortcuts & uncoordinated menu icon
0 reviews · 2h to merge
How this was measured
0% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 3 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 998 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read iina/iina weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on iina/iina — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository