Review economics
krzyzanowskim/CryptoSwift
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥0%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#1085 O(1) bit shift operation for UInt128
2 reviews · 33.6d to merge
#1084 Change IV length range for XChaCha20 cipher
1 reviews · 118.2d to merge
#1060 fix: externalRepresentation condition to validate if key is private should be d not prime
0 reviews · 202.4d to merge
#1076 Rename the `bytes` computed property in the extension on `Data` to `byteArray`
1 reviews · 8h to merge
#1077 fix tests not passing after #1076
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
0% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 174 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read krzyzanowskim/CryptoSwift weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on krzyzanowskim/CryptoSwift — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository