Review economics
neovim/neovim
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.8× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥8%
Attributed
a floor
11
Attributed PRs
89
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#41073 fix(decor): breakindent/showbreak gap ignores active highlight
10 reviews · 3.3d to merge
#41072 fix(drawline): highlight bleeds into 'linebreak' filler
4 reviews · 3.0d to merge
#41121 vim-patch:9.2.0895: test: Test_aucmd_win_scroll_multibyte() is flaky in the GUI
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#41090 fix(treesitter): make TSHighlighter.new() idempotent for an active buffer
4 reviews · 39h to merge
#41110 vim-patch:9.2.0892: highlight: wrong column highlighted with 'cursorcolumn'
0 reviews · 1h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#41093 refactor(zip)!: address entries with zip:// paths
1 reviews · 3.2d to merge
#41112 fix(dir): keep a listing buffer when the initial listing fails
5 reviews · 2.0d to merge
#41153 refactor(window): use window handle in frame layout log
1 reviews · 1h to merge
#41152 fix(options): crash on ":let &t_Co = v:true"
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#41114 refactor(ruler)!: replace C implementation with 'rulerformat' expression
9 reviews · 45h to merge
How this was measured
8% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 19515 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read neovim/neovim weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on neovim/neovim — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository