Review economics
ethereum/go-ethereum
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#35460 common/mclock: rename symbol to remove conflicts with other languages
1 reviews · 4h to merge
#35442 eth/syncer: fix nil deref when the target block is missing
1 reviews · 3.6d to merge
#35459 core, core/state: fix preimage recording in parallel block execution
1 reviews · 3h to merge
#35443 core: attach the precompile cache in parallel block execution
1 reviews · 3.5d to merge
#35457 core, eth: rename regular gas to execution gas
1 reviews · 4h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 9245 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read ethereum/go-ethereum weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on ethereum/go-ethereum — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository