Review economics
juicedata/juicefs
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.3× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥11%
Attributed
a floor
10
Attributed PRs
90
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#6726 cmd/mount: exclude gspt from libjfs.so to prevent Java process argv truncation
1 round · 5 reviews · 25h to merge
#7320 CI: use unique temp paths in test_gc_trash_slices to avoid Windows PermissionError
2 reviews · 43h to merge
#7296 ci: increase `Remove test dir` step timeout from 30 to 60 minutes
2 reviews · 5h to merge
#7284 CI: increase timeout for coverage-report (main, it) job
6 reviews · 25h to merge
#7294 CI: drop min-client-version downgrade test
2 reviews · 6h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#7355 CI: Add ut for winfsp readdir
1 reviews · 3h to merge
#7352 CI: use setup-node in dump load workflows
2 reviews · 4h to merge
#7349 test: sync bundle paths after directory rename
1 reviews · 19h to merge
#7334 cmd/sync: treat deferred deletion failures as warnings when --limit is exhausted
3 reviews · 5.7d to merge
#6768 meta/sql: support legacy tx_isolation for MySQL <= 5.7
3 reviews · 18h to merge
How this was measured
11% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 10 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 4177 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent, OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read juicedata/juicefs weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on juicedata/juicefs — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository