Review economics
juanfont/headscale
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.1× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
97
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#3403 0.29.3
0 reviews · 3h to merge
#3392 hscontrol: prefer completed auth over expired ctx in followup wait
2 reviews · 7.8d to merge
#3402 Makefile: enable CGO for `make test` in dev shell
1 reviews · 1h to merge
#3398 cli: remove leftover trace log from #3324 that always renders a JSON marshaling error
1 reviews · 14h to merge
#3394 state: fix authkey reregistration issues
1 reviews · 6.0d to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 1 PR came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 1349 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Cursor agent, GitHub Copilot coding agent, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read juanfont/headscale weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on juanfont/headscale — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository