Review economics
joewalnes/websocketd
Read from the 95 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.2× the commits after first review of the rest.
≥12%
Attributed
a floor
7
Attributed PRs
88
Other PRs
95
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#469 Modernize JS in examples and README tutorial (#465)
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#470 Modernize dev console's embedded JS (part 1 of #466)
1 reviews · 9h to merge
#468 Run each benchmark scenario 3x and report the median; bump alert threshold
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#464 Add --passstderr to forward STDERR to WebSocket clients as tagged JSON
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#463 Add --unixsocket to listen on a Unix domain socket
1 reviews · 0h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#436 fix show help message
0 reviews · 143.6d to merge
#431 Fix panic when --address not provided with --ssl and --port
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#396 added quickjs example
1 reviews · 68.9d to merge
#401 Add mobile-friendly viewport to developer console
0 reviews · 9.4d to merge
#338 Switch to go modules, preparing 0.3.1
0 reviews · 1h to merge
How this was measured
12% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read joewalnes/websocketd weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on joewalnes/websocketd — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository