Review economics
jo-inc/camofox-browser
Read from the 63 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
2
Attributed PRs
61
Other PRs
63
Read
Attributed — the latest 2
The rest — the latest 5
#8219 feat(mcp): add stdio MCP server (Claude Code, Codex, agy, Cursor, opencode)
0 reviews · 13.0d to merge
#8398 fix: add CAMOFOX_MAX_BODY_SIZE env var to control body parser limit
0 reviews · 6.7d to merge
#8491 fix: resolve npm audit vulnerabilities
0 reviews · 4.9d to merge
#8273 feat: add /tabs/:tabId/upload endpoint for file attachment
0 reviews · 12.2d to merge
#8294 fix(cookies): harden path traversal check in readCookieFile
0 reviews · 11.9d to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read jo-inc/camofox-browser weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on jo-inc/camofox-browser — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository