Review economics
jacklandrin/OnlySwitch
Read from the 40 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
40
Other PRs
40
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#211 Add Desktop Pet feature information to README
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#207 feat: sync external monitor brightness via DDC/CI (F1/F2 follows on all displays)
4 reviews · 11.4d to merge
#209 docs: add TakoAPI directory badge
2 reviews · 4.6d to merge
#204 feat(OnlyAgent): add Claude (Anthropic) as AI provider
1 reviews · 5.0d to merge
#193 feat: Add Google Authenticator feature with TOTP support
1 reviews · 5.0d to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read jacklandrin/OnlySwitch weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on jacklandrin/OnlySwitch — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository