Review economics
icsharpcode/ILSpy
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.0× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥2%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
97
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#3955 Fix #3954: name the entry point of a top-level program 'Main'
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#3931 Load ILSpy.sln via a relative path in the DotRush settings
0 reviews · 2h to merge
#3937 Pin format.ps1 to Git Bash on Windows
1 reviews · 2h to merge
#3941 Skip redundant push builds for branches with an open PR
1 reviews · 5h to merge
#3762 Add Open from NuGet feed dialog for browsing and opening packages
0 reviews · 1h to merge
How this was measured
2% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 860 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read icsharpcode/ILSpy weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on icsharpcode/ILSpy — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository