Review economics
huggingface/pytorch-image-models
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#2728 Naflex interp cache
0 reviews · 2h to merge
#2727 Improved model factory path handling. Fix #2725
0 reviews · 3h to merge
#2722 Variable train image sizes
0 reviews · 19h to merge
#2720 Make NaFlex position embedding sampling compile-friendly and memory-efficient
0 reviews · 4h to merge
#2719 Add optional key-only masks for NaFlexVit self-attention
0 reviews · 12h to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 554 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read huggingface/pytorch-image-models weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on huggingface/pytorch-image-models — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository