Review economics
jlmakes/scrollreveal
Read from the 31 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
31
Other PRs
31
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#522 Fix "Cannot read property 'bounds' of undefined' error" (#437)
0 reviews · 2.6d to merge
#456 Fix attempted property assignment on null
0 reviews · 4h to merge
#323 ScrollReveal v4
0 reviews · 550.0d to merge
#418 Allow array as first argument (for better compatibility with jQuery)
0 reviews · 11.8d to merge
#383 Various inline style fixes
0 reviews · 25h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 31 of 32 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read jlmakes/scrollreveal weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on jlmakes/scrollreveal — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository