Review economics
hatchet-dev/hatchet
Read from the 99 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥0%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
99
Other PRs
99
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#4623 refactor: move the extension contract into pkg/scheduling
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#4578 refactor: actor pattern for improving scheduling performance
5 reviews · 5.9d to merge
#4621 fix: make prom keys opt-in
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#4558 feat: serve frontend from a different base url
3 reviews · 6.9d to merge
#4617 fix: acquire step batch configs on the caller's transaction
7 reviews · 2h to merge
How this was measured
0% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 99 of 3348 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Cursor agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read hatchet-dev/hatchet weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on hatchet-dev/hatchet — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository