Review economics
hashicorp/nomad
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#28389 Backport of template: disable md5sum function in FIPS mode into release/2.0.x
1 reviews · 1h to merge
#28388 Backport of deps: replace go-kms-wrapping with temporary fork into release/2.0.x
2 reviews · 1h to merge
#28382 core: Modernize the nomad package and sub-pkgs.
1 reviews · 28h to merge
#28386 template: disable md5sum function in FIPS mode
1 reviews · 1h to merge
#28385 deps: replace go-kms-wrapping with temporary fork
3 reviews · 17h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 16210 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read hashicorp/nomad weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on hashicorp/nomad — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository