Review economics
hapijs/hapi
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.2× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥17%
Attributed
a floor
19
Attributed PRs
81
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#4396 Fix handling of no remoteAddress available
2 reviews · 14.4d to merge
#4225 Future-proof hapi for node v16, rely on res close rather than req
3 reviews · 56.3d to merge
#4366 Allow matching prereleases when validating plugin version requirements
2 reviews · 16h to merge
#4361 Upgrade production deps for hapi v21 and node v18
4 reviews · 3.0d to merge
#4357 Change default host to be IPv6-friendly
7 reviews · 31h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#4578 fix: broaden Query/Params/Headers ref defaults to `unknown`
0 reviews · 70.5d to merge
#4586 Fix cookie processing issues
1 reviews · 12h to merge
#4562 fix: auth typings and reduced type ambiguity
3 reviews · 5.2d to merge
#4577 chore: bump dependencies
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#4568 chore: bump deps
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
17% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 1147 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Devin.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read hapijs/hapi weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on hapijs/hapi — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository