Review economics
hamcrest/hamcrest-php
Read from the 55 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
54
Other PRs
55
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#88 Add native typhints to all hamcrest classes (+ install phpstan)
6 rounds · 41 reviews · 36.1d to merge
#102 ci: Add testrun for PHP 8.5
0 reviews · 84.1d to merge
#101 Update readme link for renamed action
1 reviews · 2.2d to merge
#91 Add missing php extensions to the composer.json
1 round · 5 reviews · 19h to merge
#93 Fix HasToString description
1 round · 2 reviews · 40h to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read hamcrest/hamcrest-php weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on hamcrest/hamcrest-php — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository