Review economics
ocornut/imgui
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#9480 Docs: Fix heading in FAQ.md
0 reviews · 12h to merge
#9467 Android CI: Add Gradle wrapper to pin Gradle 9.4.1 for AGP 9.2.0 compatibility (#8878)
0 reviews · 47h to merge
#3446 WIP: Native Android backend + example
21 reviews · 184.5d to merge
#7832 Examples: Fix Android example build failed issue
0 reviews · 10h to merge
#7093 Android Backend Remove Redundant Check
0 reviews · 6h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 427 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read ocornut/imgui weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on ocornut/imgui — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository