Review economics
graphhopper/graphhopper
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 2.4× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥4%
Attributed
a floor
4
Attributed PRs
96
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 4
#3362 smoother elevation for tunnels and bridges
6 reviews · 4.7d to merge
#3333 Add OSM implied access defaults to ModeAccessParser
8 reviews · 1h to merge
#3331 Support directional toll tags (toll:forward, toll:backward)
2 reviews · 1h to merge
#3293 Slope and curvature calculation must be done after bridge/tunnel interpolation
0 reviews · 0h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#3386 Racingbike: simplify 'collect'
9 reviews · 2.8d to merge
#3382 DAType refactoring
0 reviews · 6.0d to merge
#3374 More DataAccess implementations
9 reviews · 22.0d to merge
#3384 Increase bike speed for surface=wood
0 reviews · 9h to merge
#3180 Improve roundabout instruction
4 reviews · 366.1d to merge
How this was measured
4% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 1195 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code, GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read graphhopper/graphhopper weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on graphhopper/graphhopper — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository