Review economics
gpujs/gpu.js
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.5× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥13%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
97
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
#871 Pipeline compilation: createPipeline traces multi-pass programs into fused, barrier-synchronized plans
0 reviews · 4h to merge
#866 WebAssembly backend: masked f32x4 SIMD + worker threads, one step above cpu
0 reviews · 2h to merge
#856 WebGPU backend + async as a kernel property (asyncMode, mode 'async')
1 reviews · 38h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#873 build(deps): bump brace-expansion from 5.0.8 to 5.0.9
0 reviews · 19h to merge
#853 build(deps-dev): bump browserstack-local from 1.5.6 to 1.5.9
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#824 Fix cropped rendering
0 reviews · 1069.1d to merge
#779 do not compute experimental-webgl on OffscreenCanvas
0 reviews · 1407.0d to merge
#747 refactor: replace deprecated String.prototype.substr()
0 reviews · 1579.8d to merge
How this was measured
13% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 187 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read gpujs/gpu.js weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on gpujs/gpu.js — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository