Review economics
go-admin-team/go-admin
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#832 fix🐛: 修复自动生成代码时选择字段类型为int64, 前端提交还是string 导致报错的问题
0 reviews · 6.8d to merge
#834 点击编辑的时候不需要弹框确认，交互不太友好
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#814 fix🐛: declaration of new local variable causes transactions to be ign…
0 reviews · 197.0d to merge
#816 Fix:err is never used
0 reviews · 173.0d to merge
#821 fix:修复定时任务的日志打印
0 reviews · 46.4d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 229 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read go-admin-team/go-admin weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on go-admin-team/go-admin — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository