Review economics
gentilkiwi/mimikatz
Read from the 11 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
11
Other PRs
11
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#482 sekurlsa::logonpassword 24H2 and 25H2 fix
0 reviews · 24h to merge
#362 Fix crypto::cng on Windows 10 x64 1909, 2004, 20H2, 21H2
0 reviews · 369.8d to merge
#432 Added Windows 11's Structure offset and updated key+IV offset for decryption
0 reviews · 98.6d to merge
#439 [change] Convert pointer to DWORD_PTR first to eliminate compile warning
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#400 cloudap support for versions > 1909
0 reviews · 21.3d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read gentilkiwi/mimikatz weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on gentilkiwi/mimikatz — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository