Review economics
directus/directus
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#28010 dp ← Render nested relational values in unsaved and draft-version items
2 rounds · 9 reviews · 6.1d to merge
#27356 fix: correct tooltip value when decimals is 0 in pie chart panel
1 round · 6 reviews · 32.3d to merge
#27359 fix(app): trim whitespace in search input
3 reviews · 33.3d to merge
#27682 Update `directus_oauth_*` system collection visibility to match other system collections
3 reviews · 18h to merge
#27676 Fix nested `deep` query parameters being dropped when filters use dynamic variables
2 reviews · 28h to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 9144 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read directus/directus weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on directus/directus — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository