Review economics
fyne-io/fyne
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥0%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
99
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#6458 widget: sync menu item label text on Refresh
1 reviews · 11h to merge
#6452 cache: avoid a per-object allocation on every repaint, and keep repainting windows' cache entries alive
1 round · 2 reviews · 7h to merge
#6453 allocate less when walking labels
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#6449 Use Go 1.21 builtin clear() to nil slices when we can
1 reviews · 18h to merge
#6448 Fix inconsistent vertical positioning of mixed-font text lines
1 reviews · 23h to merge
How this was measured
0% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 1 PR came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 2244 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read fyne-io/fyne weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on fyne-io/fyne — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository