Review economics
evolus/pencil
Read from the 45 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
45
Other PRs
45
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#784 README.md: Mention Gentoo package `media-gfx/evoluspencil`
2 reviews · 18.2d to merge
#569 Add description for the current version.
0 reviews · 1187.2d to merge
#624 Fix error during save if document contains font which is not installed locally
0 reviews · 14h to merge
#573 Release 3.1.0
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#574 Fix invalid config for first use
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read evolus/pencil weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on evolus/pencil — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository