Review economics
ethereum/go-ethereum
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#35345 accounts/abi: set stringKind for contract-typed arguments
1 reviews · 24.8d to merge
#35302 cmd/geth: return storage slot count from traverseStorage
3 reviews · 31.2d to merge
#35461 core: surface database errors in parallel block execution
1 reviews · 14h to merge
#35462 eth/downloader: hold pivotLock when reading pivot header in progress report
1 reviews · 13h to merge
#35464 core: genesis slot number parsing
1 reviews · 5h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 9250 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read ethereum/go-ethereum weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on ethereum/go-ethereum — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository