Review economics
erebe/wstunnel
Read from the 49 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
49
Other PRs
49
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#529 ci: run tests, formatting and lint checks on pull requests
1 reviews · 17h to merge
#525 feat: print actual listen address when binding to :0
0 reviews · 15.5d to merge
#523 fix: missing timer on non-TLS server causes panic (process abort) on malformed connections
0 reviews · 6h to merge
#514 feat: Cache and hot-reload system CA certificates with thread-safe CryptoProvider initialization
0 reviews · 12.4d to merge
#513 fix: disable IPv6OrigDstAddr setsockopt on uclibc target env
0 reviews · 12.5d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read erebe/wstunnel weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on erebe/wstunnel — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository