Review economics
eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.3× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥9%
Attributed
a floor
13
Attributed PRs
87
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#3141 fix(dbgpts): inner_copy_and_install must not report a failed build as success
3 reviews · 5.4d to merge
#3140 fix(rag): deserialize table chunks when a separated chunk is present
3 reviews · 5.9d to merge
#3138 fix(client): create_datasource/create_flow must POST, not GET
3 reviews · 6.0d to merge
#3136 fix(core): StreamedBytesIO ignores negative read size and drops seek(SEEK_END) position
3 reviews · 19h to merge
#3135 fix(core): handle native bool value in VariablesProvider._convert_to_value_type
3 reviews · 20h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#3175 fix(skill): only load files named SKILL.md as Markdown skills
3 reviews · 23h to merge
#3174 fix(core): prevent command injection in MacOSTTS (#3129)
3 reviews · 20h to merge
#3117 fix(core): avoid ValueError when LLM output has multiple json fences
2 reviews · 36.0d to merge
#3173 chore: update ding QR code
2 reviews · 0h to merge
#3161 feat(subagent): Parallel sub-agent delegation execution
5 reviews · 2.3d to merge
How this was measured
9% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 1 PR came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 1156 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot coding agent, Cursor agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository