Review economics
emmabostian/developer-portfolios
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.6× the commits after first review of the rest.
≥11%
Attributed
a floor
11
Attributed PRs
89
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#4021 Added Portfolio Reference: Aniket Kshirsagar
1 reviews · 8.2d to merge
#4039 Add site Usman Ghias
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#4033 Add Pavan Gupta's Portfolio | Addresses #4031
1 reviews · 11h to merge
#4019 Add portfolio Adhivishnu M
1 reviews · 2.4d to merge
#4024 Add Rishhi Duetheesh portfolio
1 reviews · 6h to merge
How this was measured
11% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 2896 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent, Cursor agent, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read emmabostian/developer-portfolios weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on emmabostian/developer-portfolios — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository