Review economics
dotnet/csharplang
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 5.1× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥4%
Attributed
a floor
5
Attributed PRs
95
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#10235 Add proposal for await in unsafe contexts
9 reviews · 34.6d to merge
#10275 Unsafe evolution: revisit `safe` for LibraryImport
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#10249 Schedule LDM agenda for July 1
1 reviews · 1h to merge
#10233 Revising speclet for collection expression support
2 reviews · 18h to merge
#10196 Add `unsafe` expressions
28 reviews · 26.5d to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#10291 Merge factory methods proposal from jaredpar's fork
1 reviews · 1h to merge
#10289 Unsafe evolution speclet: add more modifier restrictions
8 reviews · 46h to merge
#1134 Fix ANTLR in Expression
0 reviews · 17.6d to merge
#10283 Fix wording in the notes
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#10281 Unsafe evolution speclet: update after recent LDMs
2 reviews · 23h to merge
How this was measured
4% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 1752 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read dotnet/csharplang weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on dotnet/csharplang — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository